The VHS Collaborative Blog

Co-Synchronous E-Learning – A New Term for a Proven Learning Model

April 17, 2012 by Debbie Kenny (View Bio)
Posted in:

You’ve heard of synchronous e-learning. That’s when the teacher and the students get together “live” on the internet for lessons and discussions.   

You’ve heard of asynchronous e-learning. That’s when students take online courses on their own, at their own pace. 

But what do you call e-learning when a group of students and a teacher complete an online course together over a scheduled period with regular assignments—but don’t necessarily ever log on to the course at the same time?

At The VHS Collaborative we’ve coined a new word for this style of scheduled, asynchronous learning.  We call it co-synchronous e-learning—and we believe it is the online learning model that provides the most authentic, collaborative learning experience for students.


Co-Synchronous E-Learning Defined

Co-synchronous e-learning is all about collaboration, cooperation, communication, and community.   A cohort of students complete their course together, using Web 2.0 tools to gather and share resources, debate ideas, comment on each other’s contributions, and collaborate on projects.  The teacher posts regular assignments, guides discussions, provides constructive criticism, corrects misunderstandings, asks and answers questions, and assesses student work.  There are few, if any, live interactions—so students and teachers from different time zones and on different schedules can share in the learning and choose when during the week they want to participate and complete their assignments.


Synchronous E-Learning: Real-Time Interaction, Limited Flexibility

Synchronous e-learning is a great way to bring together a group of students from geographically dispersed areas so everyone can see and hear the same things at the same time, ask questions, and participate in discussions. Synchronous e-learning works well until you are working across multiple time zones, you want all of your students to participate and engage in thoughtful discussions and assignments beyond the scheduled class time, or someone has a scheduling conflict.   Then this mode of learning becomes limited.


Asynchronous E-Learning: High Flexibility, Little Interaction

With asynchronous e-learning, students can start courses at any time and complete them at their own pace.  There is no need to wait for a scheduled class start date or slow down while your classmates catch up.  But asynchronous courses offer few opportunities for sharing and interaction.  Group projects, in depth discussions, peer feedback, and collaboration are limited, at best.  With asynchronous courses, the computer usually does the teaching and assessing, building in multiple choice and fill-in-the-blank questions to help measure progress and understanding.  There is little opportunity to explore nuance or deeper meaning.  The role of teachers, when they are available, is to answer questions and ensure progress—but otherwise students work on their own.


Co-Synchronous E-Learning: Flexible and Interactive

Unlike with synchronous e-learning, co-synchronous e-learning doesn’t require everyone to find a common time to get together.   Teachers and students can participate from anywhere at any time that fits with their personal needs, individual and academic schedule, and time zone.  And, unlike with asynchronous e-learning, co-synchronous e-learning can provide many rich opportunities for interaction and engagement—allowing every student to take the time to review lessons and assignments, form opinions, and contribute to discussions.  At The VHS Collaborative, we think that co-synchronous e-learning provides the right mix of flexibility and interactivity to deliver an authentic, engaging learning experience and enable students to participate in global online classrooms with students and teachers from around the world.


A New Word, Not a New Concept

Co-synchronous e-learning is a new word, but not a new concept.  At Virtual High School this model of teaching and learning has been developed, used, and refined for K-12 online education over the past 15 years.  15,000 students a year in 38 states and 45 countries come together through co-synchronous online classrooms to take challenging online courses that enable them to interact with their teachers and peers while being flexible enough to meet their individual scheduling needs.

 

Your Thoughts?

What do you think of the word “co-synchronous” e-learning?  Does it provide new meaning for you or give you a better understanding of this alternative mode of online learning? Have you offered or taken a co-synchronous e-learning course in your school, business, or higher education program?  What worked or didn’t work for you?  Please share your thoughts.

Comments

I know you're marketing, but...

in your description of asynchronous you say the computer does the teaching. Really? Asynchronous is only a CBT designed, and managed by a computer -- artificial intelligence? Never designed by a teacher? Instruction never written by a teacher?

And, while trying to make Co-Synchronous sound cool you reference Web 2.0 tools. Back in the early 2000s Web 2.0 was the "it" thing, but that's last decade, and now there are so many things labeled Web 2.0 it's a tired term. And much of what is called Web 2.0 is not instructionally appropriate, or even truly Web 2.0. If you need to play that card, and I'm not sure why, I'd suggest you use Learning 2.0 or move to the head of the pack and talk about Learning 3.0

Now to get the real issue. What VHS has been doing for the past almost 2 decades has been consistently described as scheduled asynchronous... with this new term you've just moved the needle from the asynchronous to the synchronous side of things; to the model of instruction where there is no research supporting any synchronous pedagogy. In fact the research base for VHS instruction doesn't talk about synchronous. Are you sure that's the direction you want to move to?

Hi Ray,  Thanks for sharing your thoughts.  I appreciate your feedback and your willingness to challenge my point of view.  Responding to your comments one at a time:

The Computer Does the Teaching...  Point taken.  It probably would have been better to say that the students learn on their own by interacting with the course on the computer.  My point was that there isn’t a live teacher lecturing students and leading discussions.

Web 2.0 as a tired term...  When I speak about Web 2.0 I'm speaking about the "social web" and the specific tools that VHS uses in our co-synchronous courses such as wikis, blogs, and social bookmarking sites to encourage collaboration and critical thinking.  I agree that these tools were new in the 2000's and aren't new news today, but the reality is that many people are still trying to get their arms around what they are and how they can be used to engage students in learning in meaningful ways.  The effective pedagogical use of these tools to support a cohort-based online learning environment can certainly be a part of Learning 2.0 discussion.  As for talking about Web 3.0, I'm sure there will be lots of opportunities on this blog for us to discuss  what’s coming next in online and blended learning.

Moving the needle towards synchronous...  What I'd like to do with this new term is to get people to realize that it is the interaction among students and teachers that matters.  No, students and teachers don’t log on to the course at the same instant in time, but they do complete their course at the same rate and together. Our CLO, Mark Buccieri, also suggested that co-Asynchronous might be the more precise term, and I can see the point, but to me our method of elearning blends the asynchronous nature of the online interaction with the synchronous nature of the overall class experience, and is neither synchronous nor asynchronous, but something different.

The reason we used Scheduled Asynchronous to describe VHS courses was that it did clearly say "students and teachers don't log on to the course at the same instant in time, but they do complete their course at the same rate and together". With synchronous in use today clearly meaning "at the same time" I think your use of it is not only inaccurate, but misleading. If you want to move the needle why not create a new term that doesn't already have a clear definition... and I don't think what you're doing with the fully online courses makes a strong connection with the synchronous overall class experience. You're mixing the approaches -- which may work very nicely for hybrid courses, but not for scheduled asynchronous courses. :-)

Made a comment and your blog is obviously moderated. The post hasn't appeared. So, you don't really want comments do you?

Hi Ray.  Sorry for the long delay in posting and responding to your comments.  Our blog is new and we did not realize that any comments had been submitted.  We mistakenly assumed that we would be notified of any new submissions.  Now that we've got this figured out, we will happily post relevant, appropriate comments whether or not they agree with our position.  In fact, the comments that don't agree can lead to fun and interesting debates -- just like in our courses.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.